Feds: ‘Cryptos are securities. Change my mind.’

What’s at stake: The global crypto market cap hovered around $2.6 trillion in value last week, per CoinMarketCap.

But what is this crypto thing? Clayton, Gensler, and federal agencies all suggest crypto tokens are “largely” used to raise money for entrepreneurs—and, as such, meet “the time-tested definitions of an investment contract and are thus under the securities laws,” in Gensler’s words.

This would mean crypto issuers that fail to register with the SEC are violating the law and could be subject to enforcement actions. But despite the seeming consensus, the government still hasn’t legally classified cryptos—so agencies like the Fed and the SEC have limited powers over them. This means crypto issuers are not held to standard disclosure requirements.

• Insiders have more information than investors when companies raise money through unregistered tokens, and investors don’t receive the “full and fair disclosure” to make prudent risk/reward assessments. Disclosure requirements would address this imbalance.
• This also leads to money-laundering concerns and fears that bad actors could use crypto to transfer funds and sidestep the traditional banking system.

Operating with limited and changing guidance, crypto players fear sudden shutdowns or lawsuits—like the SEC’s now year-old action against Ripple Labs for offering unregistered securities.

• They worry that innovation and growth in crypto-related services will be severely inhibited through “regulation by enforcement,” according to Stuart Aldroty, Ripple’s general counsel.
• They claim the government is trying to legislate a technology without first understanding it and as a result is blind to the collateral consequences.

What’s coming? Crypto players like Coinbase, Binance, and Ripple have weighed in with policy proposals, “wish lists” for crypto regulation, and vociferous criticism of how regulators decided that cryptos were securities.

But as we predicted, cries of government overreach have fallen on deaf ears. Blockchain technology and trends change quickly, but securities laws do not. Regulators are moving toward formal rule-making with their usual deliberation.

They’ve picked up the pace a little—working in “policy sprints,” in Agile methodology—which has led Morgan Stanley analysts to predict they’ll hand down guidance sooner than expected. But the analysts also cautioned that moving too fast could lead to “measures that inadvertently inhibit adoption of cryptocurrencies.”

There’s no question that the entry of the SEC will change the way in which cryptocurrency markets work. But regulatory measures are unlikely to prohibit the assets altogether or “spread peanut butter” over the booming crypto market. They’re more likely to promote mainstream acceptance:

• Crypto markets won’t flourish without a regulatory framework. 52.4% of executives at multinational companies want clarity on regulations before engaging in crypto and blockchain tech.
• Regulation will also reassure wary consumers about the legitimacy of digital assets and alleviate concerns they’re risking their nest eggs in a lawless Wild West.
• More jurisdictions aligning on crypto regulation will allow crypto firms to safely innovate and create new products and services.
• This will also help firms create risk management strategies that protect consumers and the financial system.